THE QUIZ SHOW SCANDAL: A POSTSCRIPT
This is really in the newspaper family around this
village but you might as well know about it.
The other afternoon papers treated themselves this
week to an orgy of sweet remembrances about how they
sniffed out the funny business on the quiz shows ever so
long ago and sent up all the necessary smoke signals.
Mr. Hearst's TV man remembered that he had the Herb
Stempel story all sewed up in 1957, so Mr. Howard's
TV girl rushed to her front page with her own memoir:
she smelled the strong odor of fix in April, 1957, and said
so right in the paper.
Splendid. Everybody did a fine job and everybody
is privileged to squeeze in at the head of the class if
room permits.
All we want to do is set forth here the role played by
the New York Post in this tawdry saga from the television
badlands, just so the record is reasonably straight.
Start with this:
+ Nobody pried the lid off the quiz show scandal
but District Attorney Hogan--and he did it because of a
story he read here on Aug. 18, 1958. On that day CBS
killed "Dotto" and The Post laid bare the story behind it.
A standby contestant (Eddie Hilgemeier, not named at the
time) had charged that a "Dotto" winner had been pre-fed
her answers. "That story stimulated our interest," Hogan
said on Aug. 25, "and I decided to look into it."
+ Federal Communications Commissioner Doerfer
told the House Subcommittee on Legislative Oversight
last Saturday that the FCC's first information about the
rigging of the quiz shows came from The Post. Doerfer
said that Post reporter Jack O'Grady laid the story of
the "Dotto" fix on his desk on July 31, 1958 -- 18 days
before CBS dumped the show.
The "Dotto" story happens to be the one that blew
the lid off, as they say in our profession when they're
talking about their scoops. Hilgemeier was the bust-out
"Dotto" contestant who started it all. The Post got his
affidavit, Frank Hogan stepped in, "Twenty-One" came
under scrutiny on the heels of "Dotto" and then, and
only then, the whole shaky structure of the TV Gold
Rush began to crumble.
And that brings us to Herbert Stempel.
The first tip that "Twenty-One" was not a contest
but a fixed piece of show business came to The Post
from an anonymous girl informant in March, 1957. The
girl said that Herb Stempel, ahead $49,500, had lost to
Charles Van Doren strictly on orders from the Barry &
Enright office, the producers of the show.
The Post assigned David Gelman to the story. He got
Stempel and he got Stempel's story. He couldn't get
the kind of proof or corroboration that would satisfy the
Post's attorneys that the story was libel-free. Somebody
put the Journal on Stempel's trail after that but their
reporters couldn't get it past their libel lawyers either.
On Aug. 28, 1958, after Mr. Stempel paid a visit
to the Hogan truth factory, The Post revealed that
"Twenty-One" (not named in the story, again because
of the libel laws) had come under investigation. The
Journal had that, too. The next day all the evening
papers (The World-Telegram went to it one edition
ahead, if memory serves) were able to name Stempel and
reveal that he had bared his soul to the D.A.
The Stempel story, as it happened, didn't knock
"Twenty-One" off the air. Barry & Enright evidently
managed to persuade NBC that the man's testimony
was beyond belief.
But The Post then came up with an added starter,
James Snodgrass, an artist who reached the $4,000
plateau on "Twenty-One" before he was dumped, also
charged that the program was fixed, but he backed up
his story with three sealed letters which contained
answers and stage directions for his appearances on the
tired blood quiz in mid-1957. Snodgrass had mailed the
letters to himself before he went on the air. The Post
broke his story under the by-lines of William Greaves and
Jack O'Grady on Sept. 26, 1958, and NBC killed "Twenty-One"
three weeks later, on Oct. 16.
That's the story, so help us. We just wanted to join in
the taking of the bows; there is glory to burn in this
wonderful business of ours.
|